Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Welcome to the staging ground for new communities! Each proposal has a description in the "Descriptions" category and a body of questions and answers in "Incubator Q&A". You can ask questions (and get answers, we hope!) right away, and start new proposals.

Are you here to participate in a specific proposal? Click on the proposal tag (with the dark outline) to see only posts about that proposal and not all of the others that are in progress. Tags are at the bottom of each post.

Comments on What should the "webmasters" site name and url be?

Parent

What should the "webmasters" site name and url be?

+4
−0

When SE's webmasters community was just starting out, they had a Meta discussion about what the site name should be. Although they settled on "webmasters", some of the arguments given at the time may no longer apply today.

For example, Bing still uses the term webmaster tools, but Google appears to have moved away from using the term.

If anyone has any alternative name suggestions, it might be easier to discuss possible names now, at proposal stage, rather than after the URL has been chosen.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

A very important question. Thank you for starting this discussion, trichoplax! (1 comment)
Post
+2
−1

I'm recommending sticking with Webmasters as the name with webmasters.codidact.com as the URL. It is the shortest and most succinct way to encompass the entire scope of the site.

The problem with "webmasters" is that it is outdated terminology. 20 to 25 years ago it was an actual job title. Companies hired a webmaster that was responsible for the companies website. Today, nobody has that as their job title. Creating a website is broken up into much more specialized roles:

  • Web developer
    • Front end developer
    • Back end developer
    • Devops
  • Systems admistrator
  • Web designer
  • Web copy writer
  • Community manager
  • Usability expert
  • SEO expert
  • Keyword marketer
  • Web sales
  • and many more

It is impossible for one person have all the skills needed for all of these.

I've brainstormed other names, but I have problems with all of them:

  • Websites -- Short, and sweet. But I worry it would attract lots of questions about using every website under the sun. It doesn't imply that the site is about creating and managing websites.
  • Web Developers -- Web developers would exclude the marketing, sales, writing, and other important aspects of managing websites
  • So maybe combine "websites" or "web" with a term about building or owning? I'm not sure if any of them would be any good.
    • Website Builders
    • Web Builders
    • Building Websites
    • Website Management
    • Managing Websites
    • Website Creators
    • Creating Websites
    • Web Admin
    • Webadmin
History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

3 comment threads

I go for website management (1 comment)
Google Search Console original name was Google Webmaster Tools (1 comment)
Another advantage of "webmaster" is that most people will have a pretty good idea of what it means, a... (1 comment)
I go for website management
Wicket‭ wrote over 1 year ago · edited over 1 year ago

I just added an answer with more details about "website management": https://proposals.codidact.com/posts/288452/288741#answer-288741.

I like community names that are "action" rather than "actors", i.e., I prefer "writing" over "writers". "webmaster" is a role / job name. The Web has changed a lot. Web technologies might have changed, and websites have become more complex and diverse, making the idea of having a single person do everything for most websites sound impossible. Probably in the future, we will see the name be used again but have different responsibilities than used to have 10 years ago.