Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Welcome to the staging ground for new communities! Each proposal has a description in the "Descriptions" category and a body of questions and answers in "Incubator Q&A". You can ask questions (and get answers, we hope!) right away, and start new proposals.

Are you here to participate in a specific proposal? Click on the proposal tag (with the dark outline) to see only posts about that proposal and not all of the others that are in progress. Tags are at the bottom of each post.

Comments on Home Improvement: Is it necessary to expand acronyms like OSB?

Post

Home Improvement: Is it necessary to expand acronyms like OSB?

+3
−1

There are some acronyms related to home improvement that are very well known: OSB, MDF, PVC. Most people who know the material they refer to, know the acronym. In fact, I would guess that a lot of people know the acronym but not what it stands for.

On a board about home improvement, it would be tedious to spell out oriented strand board every time. It would be like spelling out personal identification number on a security site, or automated teller machine on a banking site. Moreover, I would expect that people who don't know the acronym would simply use a search engine, which returns the correct result for these (and it didn't, adding "home improvement" certainly would). But this is all just my opinion.

For people interested in participating in the Home Improvement proposal, what do you think is the best option and why?

  1. Change nothing, let people use well-known acronyms without spelling them out.
  2. Require people to spell out all acronyms, no exceptions. Downvote and comment on questions that don't.
  3. Create tags for each acronym, like oriented-strand-board. Ensure the tag mentions both the full name, the acronym (I'm assuming typing osb can be made to still suggest oriented-strand-board) and an appropriate reference site like the wikipedia page.
  4. Something else (please explain in your answer).
History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

2 comment threads

This is an oddball idea, but we could make something similar to Judaism's Sefaria linker to automatic... (4 comments)
We have tag synonyms (1 comment)
This is an oddball idea, but we could make something similar to Judaism's Sefaria linker to automatic...
Moshi‭ wrote about 1 year ago

This is an oddball idea, but we could make something similar to Judaism's Sefaria linker to automatically detect a curated list of abbreviations and display a description of the abbreviation on hover or something.

matthewsnyder‭ wrote about 1 year ago

Oh, well if automation is on the table, could we not make the site, or some "edit-bot" user, just suggest an edit that either:

  1. Expands the first occurrence of each acronym with the most likely expansion (based on some index of acronyms)
  2. Adds a link from the first instance of each acronym to the first result from a search (for example wikipedia search, just so we don't accidentally link to a commercial store with very good SEO)
  3. Both

The asker can then get the edit notification and approve it, without wasting any human user's time. Not sure if edit queues are public, but they probably should be with this, so that people are aware it's been flagged (or the bot can just leave a comment).

It would only be for common acronyms. For uncommon acronyms, the question doesn't really apply and a human leaving a comment seems like it would be a better solution. Doing it for a whitelist of common acronyms also takes care of false-positives.

Moshi‭ wrote about 1 year ago

We don't really have a bot API (or any API) so that would go through some hoops to function. As for where to get a good repository of acronyms, I was inspired by the recent Meta post

matthewsnyder‭ wrote about 1 year ago

Oh, I think I got too ahead of myself and misunderstood your comment. Sorry! You're saying that we can just have the site itself add acronym expansions without altering the post content. That would also work though, and indeed it would be less work.