Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Descriptions

Welcome to the staging ground for new communities! Each proposal has a description in the "Descriptions" category and a body of questions and answers in "Incubator Q&A". You can ask questions (and get answers, we hope!) right away, and start new proposals.

Are you here to participate in a specific proposal? Click on the proposal tag (with the dark outline) to see only posts about that proposal and not all of the others that are in progress. Tags are at the bottom of each post.

Comments on Communities

Post

Communities

Site Name

communities.codidact.com

Description

The site is about part-time human communities. How to manage, run, create, participate in them and solve common problems.

Topics

Topics covered would include:

  • Advice on creating bylaws, for example along the lines of Robert's Rules of Order
  • Ensuring the smooth functioning of communities
  • Recruiting new members to the community
  • Integrating into a community as a member
  • How to structure the activities of the community given the needs of a member base
  • Examples of communities: Student clubs, neighborhood associations, hobby based meetups (books, games, movies, crafts), social mixers, friend groups, amateur sports leagues, coworking, casual investment clubs, facebook groups, forums, chatrooms, discord channels.
  • How to maintain the culture of the community
  • Online, offline and hybrid communities are on topic.

Exclusions

These topics or types of posts would be out of scope:

  • Social conflict within the community should only be discussed in the context of its effect on the community. For example, "a couple in my poetry club has broken up, how can I keep this from tearing the club apart?" is okay, "how do I get them back together?" is off topic (it has to do with their private lives, and not the club itself).
  • Community in the broad sense ("the journalism community at large") is off topic.
  • One off gatherings should probably be off topic. Something like a birthday party seems too fleeting to be called a real community. However, forming a "birthday committee" that regularly organizes parties for everyone would be on topic.

Special Features

I am open to ideas here. We could do fine without special features. But:

  • Online communities could advertise themselves
  • Federations of communities (like local disc golf teams in different cities) could describe themselves and encourage people to start their own version in their location
  • People can write about their success stories ("how I started movie club in my new town", "how I kept our DnD group going even after everyone graduated college")

Overlaps

We don't have a site like "interpersonal relationships" but if it existed there would be some obvious overlap. The line would be drawn around whether the interpersonal question affects the community itself.

We don't have sites about business, professional work, politics, religion etc. If we did, there would be some overlap there.

There is overlap with Webmasters because often sites have discussion boards or other participation.

There is potentially some overlap with meta.codidact.com. Questions specifically about CD should of course go there :)

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

3 comment threads

> Questions specifically about CD should of course go there Not sure why you wouldn't be able to a... (2 comments)
Casual browser (1 comment)
Why are you proposing the restriction on full-time employees, even if only one person is? In your ch... (5 comments)
Why are you proposing the restriction on full-time employees, even if only one person is? In your ch...
Monica Cellio‭ wrote about 1 year ago

Why are you proposing the restriction on full-time employees, even if only one person is? In your church example, the church has a paid minister but the lay-led bible-study group is a community. Do you think their mere affiliation with an organization that has employees changes the nature of the community in some fundamental way? I'm trying to understand where you're coming from. Thanks.

matthewsnyder‭ wrote about 1 year ago

Great question! Nothing against you personally, Monica :)

I'm not very strong on that. However, there are certain "communities" that are very complex. For example, technically Catholics are a community, imagine if people started asking questions about the actions of the Pope and cardinals. It's a very technical, in depth topic, far removed from someone organizing a neighborhood book club. Running the Vatican is not something that you can "casually" learn - it's more for enthusiasts of this particular community.

Another reason is that societies are basically large communities, and then it overlaps too much with politics. I feel like it's better to focus this section on cases where politics do not dominate the community, and I feel like with large communities it often does.

So I was trying to draw the line somewhere, and "full time manager" seemed like a reasonable place. It's a straightforward litmus test on whether something is in scope or not.

matthewsnyder‭ wrote about 1 year ago · edited about 1 year ago

I think communities with a full-time manager are worth discussing (let's call them "large" vs. "small"). But we have the question: Should large and small communities be discussed in the same site? Would there be a lot of overlap between them?

My superficial thought was that there wouldn't much overlap (as per my prev. comment). But I didn't think too deeply, so maybe I'm wrong. I don't object to removing the restriction if there's interest.

Monica Cellio‭ wrote about 1 year ago

No offense taken. (You do know that nobody at Codidact gets paid for this, right?)

There are communities (or sometimes "communities") that are driven from the top, like when a company promotes its own forum for discussions of its products. Those have paid organizers because otherwise they'd die. I think this proposal is more aimed at organic communities, the ones that are driven by their members rather than by someone at the top. Organic communities can be isolated, part of organizations with employees, part of large volunteer-run efforts, connected to non-profits... I think these groups all have things in common.

To use one of your examples, the Roman Catholic church is too big to be a community, but such-and-such parish might very much be a community. I'd suggest loosening this restriction and, if marketing-driven communities become a problem, it could be addressed then. We might learn better markers for them that way, too.

matthewsnyder‭ wrote about 1 year ago

Fair enough. Besides your logic, it is also probably safer to start broad and narrow down later while this site is small.