Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Incubator Q&A

Welcome to the staging ground for new communities! Each proposal has a description in the "Descriptions" category and a body of questions and answers in "Incubator Q&A". You can ask questions (and get answers, we hope!) right away, and start new proposals.

Are you here to participate in a specific proposal? Click on the proposal tag (with the dark outline) to see only posts about that proposal and not all of the others that are in progress. Tags are at the bottom of each post.

Comments on Conceptualizations of Race: Essentialism and Constructivism

Post

Conceptualizations of Race: Essentialism and Constructivism Article

+0
−5

Demonstrating how race is socially constructed has been a core sociological objective, yet many individuals continue to hold essentialist and other concepts of what races are and how to account for group differences. These conceptualizations have crucial consequences for intergroup attitudes, support for social policies, and structures of inequality, all of which are key sociological concerns; yet much of the research in this area has emerged outside of sociology. Our review of this interdisciplinary scholarship describes the range of views people hold, the attitudes and behaviors associated with them, and what factors contribute to these views. We focus primarily on es- sentialism and constructivism, although we describe the greater variety of beliefs beyond this dichotomy, as well as fluidity in how people use these concepts. We conclude by presenting research on strategies for reducing essentialist belief systems and identifying key areas for future research.

"Conceptualizations of Race: Essentialism and Constructivism", by Wendy D. Roth, Elena G. van Stee, and Alejandra Regla-Vargas, in the Annual Review of Sociology (published under the CC BY 4.0. license).

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

Article is for original articles? (8 comments)
Article is for original articles?
matthewsnyder‭ wrote 9 months ago

I think the "article" type is not necessarily for sharing scholarly publications, but for people who want to write an "article" in this site's model. So if instead of asking a question, you want to share information with the community, the article type allows you to bypass a clumsy self-answer.

I see that you wanted to share a scholarly article about philosophy, and provided the abstract.

My humble suggestion: Would you like to try and write an accessible summary of the paper's main points? You could try something like:

  1. Paragraph stating the main problem and why it matters
  2. Paragraph(s) explaining the argument with minimal technical jargon (only introduce terms if they are necessary)
  3. Maybe a paragraph explaining what details you left out, and pointing interested readers to the paper
  4. Final paragraph that recapitulates the main point

This might be an interesting post for people on here to read.

matthewsnyder‭ wrote 9 months ago

Using CD to share and discuss papers is a really cool idea, btw, so I'm definitely glad you decided to try this out :)

Lundin‭ wrote 9 months ago

I think step #1 here is to discuss on meta if the philosophy site should have an article/paper/resources category or not. Rather than to just jump the gun and assume that such will be on-topic and well-received.

matthewsnyder‭ wrote 9 months ago

Lundin‭ well, when the person who created the proposal decides to post an article, I take that to mean they intend for such posts to be on topic.

Lundin‭ wrote 9 months ago · edited 9 months ago

Yes but proposals isn't for creating your own personal site, to be used by you and yourself. The one who creates a proposal gets no special status. The idea is rather to find consensus of something that a lot of other people as well can form up behind. And there's no getting there without discussing scope and content of the site with others.

Canina‭ wrote 9 months ago

Also, this post feels like nothing more than a blatant copy-and-paste with absolutely no care taken whatsoever.

We focus primarily on es- sentialism and constructivism

"es- sentialism"?

matthewsnyder‭ wrote 9 months ago

He obviously just copied the abstract from the paper. This is a common thing to do when sharing papers in a hurry over emails and such.

We probably don't want to just copy/paste the abstract here, which I've already mentioned in my initial comment.

matthewsnyder‭ wrote 9 months ago

And Julius H.‭ - it's been 4 days now, come back and fix up your post dude :p