Welcome to the staging ground for new communities! Each proposal has a description in the "Descriptions" category and a body of questions and answers in "Incubator Q&A". You can ask questions (and get answers, we hope!) right away, and start new proposals.
Are you here to participate in a specific proposal? Click on the proposal tag (with the dark outline) to see only posts about that proposal and not all of the others that are in progress. Tags are at the bottom of each post.
Post History
I am still in the throes of learning this myself, but I would say logical empiricism comes close, or more broadly, analytic philosophy. It is common to hear nowadays that “logical positivism has b...
Answer
#1: Initial revision
by
Julius H.
·
2024-02-25T22:29:41Z (9 months ago)
I am still in the throes of learning this myself, but I would say [logical empiricism](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logical-empiricism/) comes close, or more broadly, [analytic philosophy](https://iep.utm.edu/analytic-philosophy/). It is common to hear nowadays that “logical positivism has been widely refuted”, but I am at this moment trying to learn more about *why*. As discussed [here](https://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/108236/why-did-the-logical-positivists-reject-metaphysics) and [here](https://philosophy.stackexchange.com/a/108116/71585), I am not fully convinced logical positivism is dead yet, (according to my limited knowledge).