Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Incubator Q&A

Welcome to the staging ground for new communities! Each proposal has a description in the "Descriptions" category and a body of questions and answers in "Incubator Q&A". You can ask questions (and get answers, we hope!) right away, and start new proposals.

Post History

60%
+1 −0
Incubator Q&A Can you always interpose an intermediate effect into any causal chain?

Charles Darwin more or less spent his whole life proving this theory to be true and it's essentially what On the Origin of Species is all about. So if you are looking for rigorous arguments in publ...

posted 2mo ago by Lundin‭

Answer
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Lundin‭ · 2024-03-25T14:56:44Z (about 2 months ago)
Charles Darwin more or less spent his whole life proving this theory to be true and it's essentially what _On the Origin of Species_ is all about. So if you are looking for rigorous arguments in published literature, with plenty of examples, this book is surely it.

In order to for his theory of natural selection to be correct, a number of sub-species must have been proven to exist. Supposedly the rich animal life at the Galápagos Islands inspired Darwin with such, as more different species showed a potential for different races and sub-species.

I'm not sure if he made any argument about an infinite amount of sub-species though, because in practice there couldn't have been more than there were individuals. But every individual in the evolution chain, say from bacteria up to human, were probably ever-so-slightly different (and we can prove this with the discovery of DNA).

From a philosophical angle, natural selection could perhaps be applied to a great deal of many other things outside biology. When one thinks of it, it is probably a natural law far broader than just evolution theory.

For example: what is it about a certain radioactive atom in a group of atoms of the same element, that causes it to decay sooner than the others? Are the atoms different from the start (inheritance) or are they differently influenced by their surroundings (environment) etc.

We can apply natural selection to anything constantly in change: civilizations, fashion, technology etc etc.