Welcome to the staging ground for new communities! Each proposal has a description in the "Descriptions" category and a body of questions and answers in "Incubator Q&A". You can ask questions (and get answers, we hope!) right away, and start new proposals.
Are you here to participate in a specific proposal? Click on the proposal tag (with the dark outline) to see only posts about that proposal and not all of the others that are in progress. Tags are at the bottom of each post.
Post History
Actually, No. You had a comprehensive list with all the details in the old place already. There were people proposing essential topics (Move, SciFi, Worldbuilding, Storytelling and more). And tho...
Answer
#3: Post edited
by
Antares
·
2024-09-01T10:30:06Z (about 2 months ago)
- Actually, No.
- You had a comprehensive list with all the details in the old place already.
- There were people proposing _essential_ topics (Move, SciFi, Worldbuilding, Storytelling and more). And those posts are _years_ old.
- There will be only those who are probably willing to "maintain" such a site actively. You won't get every user in the world to vote on such a proposal, because users are awaiting to get into a comfy ready-made place. They are not interested in constructing a new one.
- So, consider any site proposal in the other place with a vote of +4 to have _at least_ 4 people who would probably willing to contribute in _building up that baby_ - you cannot ask for more as a starting point. Those sites are actually long time overdue to a point where maybe none of those original people is going to jump in on anything.
I think you have to actively approach them and offer them to create their site. Asking for proposal and proposal and maybe another proposal will get "us"/you no where.- You won't get any new information here.
- Create the sites, let the community jump into it. If it does not work out after a while, drop/split/rename/merge them. What can you lose? Is server capacity the problem somehow?
- Actually, No.
- You had a comprehensive list with all the details in the old place already.
- There were people proposing _essential_ topics (Move, SciFi, Worldbuilding, Storytelling and more). And those posts are _years_ old.
- There will be only those who are probably willing to "maintain" such a site actively. You won't get every user in the world to vote on such a proposal, because users are awaiting to get into a comfy ready-made place. They are not interested in constructing a new one.
- So, consider any site proposal in the other place with a vote of +4 to have _at least_ 4 people who would probably willing to contribute in _building up that baby_ - you cannot ask for more as a starting point. Those sites are actually long time overdue to a point where maybe none of those original people is going to jump in on anything.
- I think you have to actively approach them and offer them to create their site. Asking for proposal and proposal and maybe another proposal will get "us"/you no where. (I realized now, there is actually really a 3rd request for proposals in the Incubator - can you see a pattern here?)
- You won't get any new information here.
- Create the sites, let the community jump into it. If it does not work out after a while, drop/split/rename/merge them. What can you lose? Is server capacity the problem somehow?
#2: Post edited
by
Antares
·
2024-09-01T10:25:20Z (about 2 months ago)
- Actually, No.
- You had a comprehensive list with all the details in the old place already.
- There were people proposing _essential_ topics (Move, SciFi, Worldbuilding, Storytelling and more). And those posts are _years_ old.
- There will be only those who are probably willing to "maintain" such a site actively. You won't get every user in the world to vote on such a proposal, because users are awaiting to get into a comfy ready-made place. They are not interested in constructing a new one.
- So, consider any site proposal in the other place with a vote of +4 to have _at least_ 4 people who would probably willing to contribute in _building up that baby_ - you cannot ask for more as a starting point. Those sites are actually long time overdue to a point where maybe none of those original people is going to jump in on anything.
- I think you have to actively approach them and offer them to create their site. Asking for proposal and proposal and maybe another proposal will get "us"/you no where.
- You won't get any new information here.
Create the sites, let the community jump into it. If it does not work out after a while, drop it again. What can you lose? Is server capacity the problem somehow?
- Actually, No.
- You had a comprehensive list with all the details in the old place already.
- There were people proposing _essential_ topics (Move, SciFi, Worldbuilding, Storytelling and more). And those posts are _years_ old.
- There will be only those who are probably willing to "maintain" such a site actively. You won't get every user in the world to vote on such a proposal, because users are awaiting to get into a comfy ready-made place. They are not interested in constructing a new one.
- So, consider any site proposal in the other place with a vote of +4 to have _at least_ 4 people who would probably willing to contribute in _building up that baby_ - you cannot ask for more as a starting point. Those sites are actually long time overdue to a point where maybe none of those original people is going to jump in on anything.
- I think you have to actively approach them and offer them to create their site. Asking for proposal and proposal and maybe another proposal will get "us"/you no where.
- You won't get any new information here.
- Create the sites, let the community jump into it. If it does not work out after a while, drop/split/rename/merge them. What can you lose? Is server capacity the problem somehow?
#1: Initial revision
by
Antares
·
2024-09-01T10:14:08Z (about 2 months ago)
Actually, No. You had a comprehensive list with all the details in the old place already. There were people proposing _essential_ topics (Move, SciFi, Worldbuilding, Storytelling and more). And those posts are _years_ old. There will be only those who are probably willing to "maintain" such a site actively. You won't get every user in the world to vote on such a proposal, because users are awaiting to get into a comfy ready-made place. They are not interested in constructing a new one. So, consider any site proposal in the other place with a vote of +4 to have _at least_ 4 people who would probably willing to contribute in _building up that baby_ - you cannot ask for more as a starting point. Those sites are actually long time overdue to a point where maybe none of those original people is going to jump in on anything. I think you have to actively approach them and offer them to create their site. Asking for proposal and proposal and maybe another proposal will get "us"/you no where. You won't get any new information here. Create the sites, let the community jump into it. If it does not work out after a while, drop it again. What can you lose? Is server capacity the problem somehow?