Welcome to the staging ground for new communities! Each proposal has a description in the "Descriptions" category and a body of questions and answers in "Incubator Q&A". You can ask questions (and get answers, we hope!) right away, and start new proposals.
Are you here to participate in a specific proposal? Click on the proposal tag (with the dark outline) to see only posts about that proposal and not all of the others that are in progress. Tags are at the bottom of each post.
Post History
Answer! Click or tap here to reveal In terms of volume, six of the L-shaped pieces have the correct total volume to form the desired 3-dimensional object (whose volume is 18 unit cubes) but it i...
#1: Initial revision
by
will.octagon.gibson
·
2026-05-30T21:39:21Z (4 months ago)
<details> <summary>Answer! Click or tap here to reveal</summary> In terms of volume, six of the L-shaped pieces have the correct total volume to form the desired 3-dimensional object (whose volume is 18 unit cubes) but it is nevertheless **impossible** to form the desired object with six L-shaped pieces. </details> <br> <details> <summary>Justification! Click or tap here to reveal</summary> **Proof of answer:** Color seven of the unit cubes of the desired 3-dimensional object red as shown below:  <br> Note: One of the red unit cubes at the bottom level of the desired object is not visible in the above diagram but its position can be determined in the following cross sectional view:  We only have six L-shaped pieces but there are seven unit cubes colored red. By the [Pigeonhole principle,](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pigeonhole_principle) at least one of the L-shaped pieces must fill at least two red unit cubes. But the red unit cubes are too far apart to allow this. Therefore it is not possible to use six of the L-shaped pieces to form the desired 3-dimensional object. </details>