Welcome to the staging ground for new communities! Each proposal has a description in the "Descriptions" category and a body of questions and answers in "Incubator Q&A". You can ask questions (and get answers, we hope!) right away, and start new proposals.
Are you here to participate in a specific proposal? Click on the proposal tag (with the dark outline) to see only posts about that proposal and not all of the others that are in progress. Tags are at the bottom of each post.
Post History
I'm going to post some puzzles as a test of a category of puzzle that does not require finding an insight, but just following steps. If solving a puzzle that requires an insight is like painting, t...
#5: Post edited
by
trichoplax
·
2026-07-19T00:14:29Z (2 months ago)
Add banana wordsearch example
- I'm going to post some puzzles as a test of a category of puzzle that does not require finding an insight, but just following steps. If solving a puzzle that requires an insight is like painting, the type proposed here would be like colouring in, or painting by numbers. I can imagine there being some demand for such puzzles, but I can also imagine them being frustrating to people seeking the challenge of finding an insight, so they would need to be clearly labelled to avoid wasting anyone's time.
- In this Meta post I'm seeking answers to 2 questions:
- 1. Would you like to see this kind of puzzle in this community? This is not about whether you personally would be likely to post or solve such puzzles, but whether you think they should be on topic here.
- 2. If we allow such puzzles, what name should their tag have, so that they are easily distinguishable from puzzles that require insight?
- I'm not sure if it's possible to draw a clear line between puzzles that require insight and puzzles that do not, so I'm posting extreme examples which definitely require no insight, to start a discussion about whether they are welcome and whether they can be separated.
- ## Examples
- These give an idea of what I'm trying to describe. Please suggest any improvements to how this category of puzzles should be described, or any reasons it should be more than one category of puzzles.
- - [Missing missing digit](https://proposals.codidact.com/posts/296394)
- [How many bananas in a bunch?](https://proposals.codidact.com/posts/296395)
- I'm going to post some puzzles as a test of a category of puzzle that does not require finding an insight, but just following steps. If solving a puzzle that requires an insight is like painting, the type proposed here would be like colouring in, or painting by numbers. I can imagine there being some demand for such puzzles, but I can also imagine them being frustrating to people seeking the challenge of finding an insight, so they would need to be clearly labelled to avoid wasting anyone's time.
- In this Meta post I'm seeking answers to 2 questions:
- 1. Would you like to see this kind of puzzle in this community? This is not about whether you personally would be likely to post or solve such puzzles, but whether you think they should be on topic here.
- 2. If we allow such puzzles, what name should their tag have, so that they are easily distinguishable from puzzles that require insight?
- I'm not sure if it's possible to draw a clear line between puzzles that require insight and puzzles that do not, so I'm posting extreme examples which definitely require no insight, to start a discussion about whether they are welcome and whether they can be separated.
- ## Examples
- These give an idea of what I'm trying to describe. Please suggest any improvements to how this category of puzzles should be described, or any reasons it should be more than one category of puzzles.
- - [Missing missing digit](https://proposals.codidact.com/posts/296394)
- - [How many bananas in a bunch?](https://proposals.codidact.com/posts/296395)
- - [Letter shifting](https://proposals.codidact.com/posts/296397)
#4: Post edited
by
trichoplax
·
2026-07-18T23:36:01Z (2 months ago)
Add banana wordsearch example
- I'm going to post some puzzles as a test of a category of puzzle that does not require finding an insight, but just following steps. If solving a puzzle that requires an insight is like painting, the type proposed here would be like colouring in, or painting by numbers. I can imagine there being some demand for such puzzles, but I can also imagine them being frustrating to people seeking the challenge of finding an insight, so they would need to be clearly labelled to avoid wasting anyone's time.
- In this Meta post I'm seeking answers to 2 questions:
- 1. Would you like to see this kind of puzzle in this community? This is not about whether you personally would be likely to post or solve such puzzles, but whether you think they should be on topic here.
- 2. If we allow such puzzles, what name should their tag have, so that they are easily distinguishable from puzzles that require insight?
- I'm not sure if it's possible to draw a clear line between puzzles that require insight and puzzles that do not, so I'm posting extreme examples which definitely require no insight, to start a discussion about whether they are welcome and whether they can be separated.
- ## Examples
- These give an idea of what I'm trying to describe. Please suggest any improvements to how this category of puzzles should be described, or any reasons it should be more than one category of puzzles.
- [Missing missing digit](https://proposals.codidact.com/posts/296394)
- I'm going to post some puzzles as a test of a category of puzzle that does not require finding an insight, but just following steps. If solving a puzzle that requires an insight is like painting, the type proposed here would be like colouring in, or painting by numbers. I can imagine there being some demand for such puzzles, but I can also imagine them being frustrating to people seeking the challenge of finding an insight, so they would need to be clearly labelled to avoid wasting anyone's time.
- In this Meta post I'm seeking answers to 2 questions:
- 1. Would you like to see this kind of puzzle in this community? This is not about whether you personally would be likely to post or solve such puzzles, but whether you think they should be on topic here.
- 2. If we allow such puzzles, what name should their tag have, so that they are easily distinguishable from puzzles that require insight?
- I'm not sure if it's possible to draw a clear line between puzzles that require insight and puzzles that do not, so I'm posting extreme examples which definitely require no insight, to start a discussion about whether they are welcome and whether they can be separated.
- ## Examples
- These give an idea of what I'm trying to describe. Please suggest any improvements to how this category of puzzles should be described, or any reasons it should be more than one category of puzzles.
- - [Missing missing digit](https://proposals.codidact.com/posts/296394)
- - [How many bananas in a bunch?](https://proposals.codidact.com/posts/296395)
#3: Post edited
by
trichoplax
·
2026-07-18T23:03:37Z (2 months ago)
Add request for improvements to the description
- I'm going to post some puzzles as a test of a category of puzzle that does not require finding an insight, but just following steps. If solving a puzzle that requires an insight is like painting, the type proposed here would be like colouring in, or painting by numbers. I can imagine there being some demand for such puzzles, but I can also imagine them being frustrating to people seeking the challenge of finding an insight, so they would need to be clearly labelled to avoid wasting anyone's time.
- In this Meta post I'm seeking answers to 2 questions:
- 1. Would you like to see this kind of puzzle in this community? This is not about whether you personally would be likely to post or solve such puzzles, but whether you think they should be on topic here.
- 2. If we allow such puzzles, what name should their tag have, so that they are easily distinguishable from puzzles that require insight?
- I'm not sure if it's possible to draw a clear line between puzzles that require insight and puzzles that do not, so I'm posting extreme examples which definitely require no insight, to start a discussion about whether they are welcome and whether they can be separated.
- ## Examples
- - [Missing missing digit](https://proposals.codidact.com/posts/296394)
- I'm going to post some puzzles as a test of a category of puzzle that does not require finding an insight, but just following steps. If solving a puzzle that requires an insight is like painting, the type proposed here would be like colouring in, or painting by numbers. I can imagine there being some demand for such puzzles, but I can also imagine them being frustrating to people seeking the challenge of finding an insight, so they would need to be clearly labelled to avoid wasting anyone's time.
- In this Meta post I'm seeking answers to 2 questions:
- 1. Would you like to see this kind of puzzle in this community? This is not about whether you personally would be likely to post or solve such puzzles, but whether you think they should be on topic here.
- 2. If we allow such puzzles, what name should their tag have, so that they are easily distinguishable from puzzles that require insight?
- I'm not sure if it's possible to draw a clear line between puzzles that require insight and puzzles that do not, so I'm posting extreme examples which definitely require no insight, to start a discussion about whether they are welcome and whether they can be separated.
- ## Examples
- These give an idea of what I'm trying to describe. Please suggest any improvements to how this category of puzzles should be described, or any reasons it should be more than one category of puzzles.
- - [Missing missing digit](https://proposals.codidact.com/posts/296394)
#2: Post edited
by
trichoplax
·
2026-07-18T22:58:32Z (2 months ago)
Add example
- I'm going to post some puzzles as a test of a category of puzzle that does not require finding an insight, but just following steps. If solving a puzzle that requires an insight is like painting, the type proposed here would be like colouring in, or painting by numbers. I can imagine there being some demand for such puzzles, but I can also imagine them being frustrating to people seeking the challenge of finding an insight, so they would need to be clearly labelled to avoid wasting anyone's time.
- In this Meta post I'm seeking answers to 2 questions:
- 1. Would you like to see this kind of puzzle in this community? This is not about whether you personally would be likely to post or solve such puzzles, but whether you think they should be on topic here.
- 2. If we allow such puzzles, what name should their tag have, so that they are easily distinguishable from puzzles that require insight?
I'm not sure if it's possible to draw a clear line between puzzles that require insight and puzzles that do not, so I'm posting extreme examples which definitely require no insight, to start a discussion about whether they are welcome and whether they can be separated.
- I'm going to post some puzzles as a test of a category of puzzle that does not require finding an insight, but just following steps. If solving a puzzle that requires an insight is like painting, the type proposed here would be like colouring in, or painting by numbers. I can imagine there being some demand for such puzzles, but I can also imagine them being frustrating to people seeking the challenge of finding an insight, so they would need to be clearly labelled to avoid wasting anyone's time.
- In this Meta post I'm seeking answers to 2 questions:
- 1. Would you like to see this kind of puzzle in this community? This is not about whether you personally would be likely to post or solve such puzzles, but whether you think they should be on topic here.
- 2. If we allow such puzzles, what name should their tag have, so that they are easily distinguishable from puzzles that require insight?
- I'm not sure if it's possible to draw a clear line between puzzles that require insight and puzzles that do not, so I'm posting extreme examples which definitely require no insight, to start a discussion about whether they are welcome and whether they can be separated.
- ## Examples
- - [Missing missing digit](https://proposals.codidact.com/posts/296394)
#1: Initial revision
by
trichoplax
·
2026-07-18T19:21:49Z (2 months ago)
Puzzles with no insight required
I'm going to post some puzzles as a test of a category of puzzle that does not require finding an insight, but just following steps. If solving a puzzle that requires an insight is like painting, the type proposed here would be like colouring in, or painting by numbers. I can imagine there being some demand for such puzzles, but I can also imagine them being frustrating to people seeking the challenge of finding an insight, so they would need to be clearly labelled to avoid wasting anyone's time. In this Meta post I'm seeking answers to 2 questions: 1. Would you like to see this kind of puzzle in this community? This is not about whether you personally would be likely to post or solve such puzzles, but whether you think they should be on topic here. 2. If we allow such puzzles, what name should their tag have, so that they are easily distinguishable from puzzles that require insight? I'm not sure if it's possible to draw a clear line between puzzles that require insight and puzzles that do not, so I'm posting extreme examples which definitely require no insight, to start a discussion about whether they are welcome and whether they can be separated.