Welcome to the staging ground for new communities! Each proposal has a description in the "Descriptions" category and a body of questions and answers in "Incubator Q&A". You can ask questions (and get answers, we hope!) right away, and start new proposals.
Are you here to participate in a specific proposal? Click on the proposal tag (with the dark outline) to see only posts about that proposal and not all of the others that are in progress. Tags are at the bottom of each post.
Post History
Most proposals here were just made by 1 single inactive person who had no intention to push the proposal further at all, they just liked to propose something and then log off. Well... thanks, off y...
#2: Post edited
- Most proposals here were just made by 1 single inactive person who had no intention to push the proposal further at all, they just liked to propose something and then log off. Well... thanks, off you go then...
- The second-most common proposal is the one with 1 single active person, who are doing the necessary work but need similar users to back them up. Usually they give up after a while and then the proposal ends up in the freezer.
So I think the minimum criteria needs to be that there is _a handful of active domain experts_ who can push the site forward. People who can finish setting the site scope, who can post a lot of Q&A to get the site going, and who are also potential moderator material. Without those the site will quickly die off. Some rough metric would be ~5 active domain experts where some of them can also be the first moderators.
- Most proposals here were just made by 1 single inactive person who had no intention to push the proposal further at all, they just liked to propose something and then log off. Well... thanks, off you go then...
- The second-most common proposal is the one with 1 single active person, who are doing the necessary work but need similar users to back them up. Usually they give up after a while and then the proposal ends up in the freezer.
- So I think the minimum criteria needs to be that there is _a handful of active domain experts_ who can push the site forward. People who can finish setting the site scope, who can post a lot of Q&A to get the site going, and who are also potential moderator material. Without those the site will quickly die off. Some rough metric would be ~5 active domain experts where some of them can also be the first moderators.
- Adding casual users on top of that is less of a problem - personally I've been casually active on lots of communities just to help with activity, even if I'm not really interested in that community myself. Anyone can ask questions, if nothing else.
#1: Initial revision
Most proposals here were just made by 1 single inactive person who had no intention to push the proposal further at all, they just liked to propose something and then log off. Well... thanks, off you go then... The second-most common proposal is the one with 1 single active person, who are doing the necessary work but need similar users to back them up. Usually they give up after a while and then the proposal ends up in the freezer. So I think the minimum criteria needs to be that there is _a handful of active domain experts_ who can push the site forward. People who can finish setting the site scope, who can post a lot of Q&A to get the site going, and who are also potential moderator material. Without those the site will quickly die off. Some rough metric would be ~5 active domain experts where some of them can also be the first moderators.
