Welcome to the staging ground for new communities! Each proposal has a description in the "Descriptions" category and a body of questions and answers in "Incubator Q&A". You can ask questions (and get answers, we hope!) right away, and start new proposals.
Are you here to participate in a specific proposal? Click on the proposal tag (with the dark outline) to see only posts about that proposal and not all of the others that are in progress. Tags are at the bottom of each post.
Post History
For me, this puzzle was the right level of difficulty; not too easy and not too hard. To solve this puzzle I used intelligent trial and error. To reduce the number of possibilities I used the fac...
#2: Post edited
- For me, this puzzle was the right level of difficulty; not too easy and not too hard.
- To solve this puzzle I used intelligent trial and error. To reduce the number of possibilities I used the fact that there must be two adjacent faces of the cube that are both covered with tiles each of which has two arcs.
- <details>
- <summary>Solution! Click here to reveal</summary>
- </details>
- For me, this puzzle was the right level of difficulty; not too easy and not too hard.
- To solve this puzzle I used intelligent trial and error. To reduce the number of possibilities I used the fact that there must be two adjacent faces of the cube that are both covered with tiles each of which has two arcs.
- <details>
- <summary>Solution! Click here to reveal</summary>
- 
- </details>
#1: Initial revision
For me, this puzzle was the right level of difficulty; not too easy and not too hard. To solve this puzzle I used intelligent trial and error. To reduce the number of possibilities I used the fact that there must be two adjacent faces of the cube that are both covered with tiles each of which has two arcs. <details> <summary>Solution! Click here to reveal</summary>  </details>
