Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Welcome to the staging ground for new communities! Each proposal has a description in the "Descriptions" category and a body of questions and answers in "Incubator Q&A". You can ask questions (and get answers, we hope!) right away, and start new proposals.

Are you here to participate in a specific proposal? Click on the proposal tag (with the dark outline) to see only posts about that proposal and not all of the others that are in progress. Tags are at the bottom of each post.

Comments on Supporters for a Worldbuilding community on Codidact

Parent

Supporters for a Worldbuilding community on Codidact

+0
−4

I would like to get a picture of the general supporters (those who are "okay" with this) for a Worldbuilding community. Supporters are not meant to be obliged to participate actively. Just interested in it and not opposed to it. See the proposal for details.

  • If you just want to give a quick feedback, please vote

    • [+] --> "I'm okay with that, why not"
    • [-] --> "No, I do not want to see such a community here ever"
  • Feel free to suggest topics in the comments if you don't want to go into details but maybe have concerns a young community-to-be should consider.

For those who are planning on participating by posting Q&A on Worldbuilding later on: please add an answer with a few sentences outlining what you think a Worldbuilding community should be like. Or what you think would be most important to you. Or just what you would like to have clarification about (Scope for example). Or ... just ask by adding an answer with your question.

Also make sure to read the proposal carefully and point out anything that bothers you with it here as a dedicated answer (we can then use the comments to detail the discussion about it or decide to create a new meta post for it).

Also consider to "react" (below the title where the voting arrows usually are) on that Worldbuilding proposal to indicate your interest level.

This should get us going, to have a discussion about the outlines of the community-to-be.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

Post
+5
−1
I would like to get a picture of the general supporters (those who are "okay" with this) for a Worldbuilding community.

There is already a mechanism for this. Let's not confuse things by creating a second one. Anyone interested in a new community selects one of several "reactions" to the original site proposal. See below:

As you can see, currently four people have already done this, including you.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

2 comment threads

Dangerous (3 comments)
Why didn't you register? (4 comments)
Dangerous
Antares‭ wrote 3 months ago

The post does not answer my question.

Monica Cellio‭ wrote 3 months ago

That's not really what "dangerous" is for, and also, since it shows the people who are following a proposal, it looks like an answer to me.

Antares‭ wrote 3 months ago · edited 3 months ago

Monica Cellio‭: I specifically asked for a special feedback by voting. I did not ask "How can I express my interest". I am not convinced that the react function gives a complete picture. Otherwise I would not have posted my question. I know that this feature exists. But I also know that there are people not using it.

And secondly I specifically asked for input by those who have suggestions on the topic of Worldbuilding. What Olin posted would maybe be okay as a comment. But it still would not cover any answer to my question. It is just lecturing.

I didn't want to flag the answer as spam or something, but maybe I should have. Instead I used the react function as others did by adding a "works for me". Yeah, how interesting. But it does not work for me. This reaction was missing, therefore I went with dangerous.